What is the measure of this perfection? Is there a perfect form of beauty for every natural and created object? Or is this merely a subjective matter? If the latter, how can we agree about what is beautiful? Is perfection of the human form measured against an aesthetic, moral, or divine standard? Religion has concerned itself with beauty precisely because of the inability of human beings to recognize or create perfection. Ideally, beauty would produce aesthetic pleasure spontaneously in all those human subjects whose cognitive dispositions are cultivated for their own perfection. If the disposition for beauty is a human cognitive capacity, then once beauty is acquired in its true form it would be universally communicable. A virtue achieves truth to the degree that it acquires its distinctive form of perfection perfection is the goal ( telos ) for the cultivation of virtues. Beauty's recognition is similar to the cultivation of the moral virtues of justice and goodness. ![]() This cultivation involves attending to an object (or subject) to recognize its (or her) beauty. The question is whether this subjective response to a beautiful object can be spontaneous and universally communicable.Ĭertain philosophers have argued that pleasurable enjoyment of beautiful artistic creations is not originally spontaneous, but needs to be cultivated as a cognitive disposition. Immanuel Kant thought other objects beautiful to the degree they conform to objects in nature (Kant, 1953, paras. For example, the beauty of a rose produces an aesthetic pleasure. ![]() BEAUTY is said to be a property of an object that produces an aesthetic pleasure this pleasure is a subjective response to a beautiful object, often, but not always, in nature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |